Likes Likes:  8
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Sea-Dweller ID

  1. #1
    Super Member Raza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    24,510
    Blog Entries
    5

    Sea-Dweller ID

    Hey, a buddy of mine from another forum has a Sea-Dweller and he was wondering if I could help him figure out what generation it was. He sent me this photo:

    Name:  IMG_5761.jpg
Views: 64
Size:  145.0 KB

    I know very little about Sea-Dwellers, so I’m hoping you could ID it for me!
    Read my latest IWL blog entry! An Ode To Rule Breaking

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Lakeland, Florida
    Posts
    3,715
    Is it the model number or the serial number you may find etched into the case under the bracelet end link?
    .
    .
    .

    Retired from Fire/Rescue January 2019 with 30 years on the job

  3. #3
    Hi buddy i had one in the early 70s that would have been an early one from the late 60s , this was before i got into watches otherwise would still have it or traded for a small house ! Think there were maybe 4 variants of sea dweller i think this would be post 77'because of the layout of the dial taxt, not sure of the variant no but if the case its only 77 to discontinued in 83' tell him to , i envy him my friend , think i paid about £200 and traded airking for it , those were the days my friend , hope you are well buddy good ti see old names still here , regards Peter

  4. #4
    Super Member Raza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    24,510
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckmiller View Post
    Is it the model number or the serial number you may find etched into the case under the bracelet end link?
    I think he’s just looking for the model number. Like the internal Rolex generational code, like how my Submariner is a 114060 and Steve McQueens was a 5512 or something like that.
    Read my latest IWL blog entry! An Ode To Rule Breaking

  5. #5
    Super Member Raza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    24,510
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by shameless View Post
    Hi buddy i had one in the early 70s that would have been an early one from the late 60s , this was before i got into watches otherwise would still have it or traded for a small house ! Think there were maybe 4 variants of sea dweller i think this would be post 77'because of the layout of the dial taxt, not sure of the variant no but if the case its only 77 to discontinued in 83' tell him to , i envy him my friend , think i paid about £200 and traded airking for it , those were the days my friend , hope you are well buddy good ti see old names still here , regards Peter
    So you’re saying post 1977? That should narrow it down a bit. I remember they made the Sea-Dweller in the 40mm size for a while, I think I was looking at them before I got my Submariner (and back when I still didn’t mind date complications). That must have been 2010-2012? It definitely looks like an older, sort of pre-Glidelock era of Rolex.

    I think it’s a 16600, which would date it between 1989 and 2009. Doubt it’s a 16660 because the lume hasn’t yellowed.
    Last edited by Raza; Apr 7, 2025 at 02:19 PM.
    Read my latest IWL blog entry! An Ode To Rule Breaking

  6. #6
    I think all sea dwellers were made in 40mm from conception up until newer releases that now measure 43mm

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Lakeland, Florida
    Posts
    3,715
    Remove the back cover and have a look. That will tell all. If doing that destroys the o-ring then it's time for a service anyway. If the gasket survives then lube it and put the cover back on.
    Last edited by chuckmiller; Apr 7, 2025 at 03:08 PM.
    .
    .
    .

    Retired from Fire/Rescue January 2019 with 30 years on the job

  8. #8
    Hall Monitor Samanator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Sebring, Florida
    Posts
    10,232

    Sea-Dweller ID

    Agree on that one that it is from the 70’s. The 43 I believe was 2014, but I need to check my pictures to confirm that. The one before that was pretty thick and had the first ceramic bezel on a sea dweller..


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Cheers,

    Michael

    Tell everyone you saw it on IWL!

  9. #9
    Hall Monitor Samanator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Sebring, Florida
    Posts
    10,232

    Sea-Dweller ID

    Quote Originally Posted by chuckmiller View Post
    Remove the back cover and have a look. That will tell all. If doing that destroys the o-ring then it's time for a service anyway. If the gasket survives then lube it and put the cover back on.


    That’s not so easy because you need the fine tooth case socket that fits the rear bezel. Generally, they’re too tight to use one of the balls on.

    As shameless said the member should be between the two looks behind the bracelet so you don’t need to remove the case back.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Cheers,

    Michael

    Tell everyone you saw it on IWL!

  10. #10
    Super Member Raza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    24,510
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Samanator View Post
    Agree on that one that it is from the 70’s. The 43 I believe was 2014, but I need to check my pictures to confirm that. The one before that was pretty thick and had the first ceramic bezel on a sea dweller..


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    You really think 70s? With lume that hasn’t gone cream colored? In that picture, it looks pretty white still to me, which makes me think it’s Luminova or SuperLuminova, which would make it way more recent, 16600 gen or thereabouts.

    EDITL: Nevermind, he confirmed that the dial says “T Swiss T<25“, so it has to be a pre-Luminova model, meaning early 16600 is the newest it could be because that’s the generation they transitioned from tritium.
    Last edited by Raza; Apr 8, 2025 at 03:29 PM.
    Read my latest IWL blog entry! An Ode To Rule Breaking

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About Us
We are an independent and wide-ranging forum for watch enthusiasts. From mainspring to microchip, from Europe to Asia, from micro-brand to boutique - we cover it all. Novice or expert, we want you to feel at home. Whether it's asking a simple question or contributing to the fund of horological knowledge, it's all the same hobby. Or, if you like, you can just show us a picture of your new watch. We'll provide the welcoming and courteous environment, the rest is up to you!
Join us