-
Mar 26, 2015, 06:20 PM
#21
Originally Posted by
mlcor
Well, then if, hypothetically, your friend had a similar wrist size (<7"), I would tell him that this should fit him perfectly, and he has nothing to fear but fear itself. Or something like that.
And maybe a little bit of ribbing now and then from forum friends whenever he wears such a dainty little watch.
I can think of no reason why they would go out of their way to label that watch a ladies' watch. Marketing people often do more harm than good.
In the William Gibson article posted this week, he mentions that the contemporary standard for a man's watch is 36 mm. Just last week, Rolex introduced a 39 mm version of their most basic watch, the Oyster Perpetual. Before that, the largest size it came in was 36 mm. I'm guessing they sold a large number of those to men and women. Marketing folks need to get over the need to genderize everything. (As the father of a young daughter, I will refrain from sharing how angering it can be to try to find toys that do not have a gender bias.)
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Mar 26, 2015, 07:14 PM
#22
MultiModerator
I agree with all above. This is not a ladies watch. If it weren't for the date window, I would be very tempted myself
This is what I regard as a ladies watch:
(disclaimer: I don't think this is the sort of watch women are limited to. I love seeing for example a sub on a female wrist!)
Last edited by Martin; Mar 26, 2015 at 07:19 PM.
-
Mar 26, 2015, 07:28 PM
#23
I have a confession to make...I don't have a friend. I mean I do have friends, but it was me, and that was the watch I almost pulled the trigger on.
Seriously though, It's kind of funny how I really had to justify wanting to buy the watch at first. The size is in my sweet spot, it had a nice look to it, but right there on the front cover of the owner's manual MASTER COMPRESSOR LADY!
I really can't imagine who got paid for this type of marketing job. I don't think they're making this watch any more and think it may have been a bigger seller if they had called it something different; maybe a midsize, MC 37, whatever.
In the end, I walked away because we were to far apart in what they wanted, and what I was willing to pay. If truthful, I may have been less willing to budge on my end because it was marketed as a lady's watch.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
Post Thanks / Like - 3 Likes
-
Mar 26, 2015, 07:44 PM
#24
Somehow Mistress Compressor summons up a whole other mental image
-
Post Thanks / Like - 4 Likes
-
Mar 26, 2015, 07:45 PM
#25
Originally Posted by
Col Angus
I have a confession to make...I don't have a friend. I mean I do have friends, but it was me, and that was the watch I almost pulled the trigger on.
Originally Posted by
Col Angus
The size is in my sweet spot, it had a nice look to it, but right there on the front cover of the owner's manual MASTER COMPRESSOR LADY!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
This would be a serious problem if you were planning to wear the manual strapped to your wrist instead of the watch... But, I suppose you would have other potentially serious problems as well if you were going to do that.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Mar 26, 2015, 07:49 PM
#26
P.S. I scooped up this Maurice Lacroix a while back; it was advertised as a women's watch, erroneously--the ML website listed it as a men's. It's 37mm.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Mar 26, 2015, 07:58 PM
#27
i do not understand the problem -this is my birthyear watch Bulova Director from 47'
Last edited by shameless; Mar 26, 2015 at 08:17 PM.
-
Mar 26, 2015, 08:00 PM
#28
Originally Posted by
mlcor
P.S. I scooped up this Maurice Lacroix a while back; it was advertised as a women's watch, erroneously--the ML website listed it as a men's. It's 37mm.
That would be a very masculine looking women's watch!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Mar 26, 2015, 10:03 PM
#29
Member
Zenith marketing does the same thing.
The Ladies' Star Moonphase, in a 37mm tv screen case.
Looks good to me...
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Mar 29, 2015, 12:14 AM
#30
Misunderadjustimated
Originally Posted by
Col Angus
OK, I have this friend, right? And he saw this watch he liked. I, err I mean HE thought its proportions were much better done than the men's model, where the men's is a bit grotesque, this one seems more subdued yet still out of the ordinary.
Originally Posted by
mlcor
^^^^this.
If that's a "feminine" watch, then I'm the Pope. If the size is at least 37mm without the crowns, it's definitely suitable unless you have gorilla wrists...
Originally Posted by
Col Angus
I checked with my friend and he says its 37mm.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
You kiddin'? I'd wrestle my wife to the ground to wear that watch.
Updated after some divestment:
Glashütte Original Senator Hand Date (GONE) | Omega Speedmaster Broad Arrow (GONE - turns out I don’t much care for chronographs) | Omega Seamaster 300 GMT "Great White" | Rolex Datejust 16013 | Ulysse Nardin 14K chronometre (c. 1960s) | Marathon TSAR | Meistersinger Metris | Apple Watch
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes