I didn’t mean to exclude them, only ones that I either haven’t thought about or never heard of to begin with. If you look at the numbers, this is how Tudor’s lineup breaks down:
Black Bay: 117
Pelagos: 8
1926: 55
Ranger: 3
Royal: 70
Clair De Rose: 12
So nearly 50 more models in the Black Bay line than the next closest and as a total production, Black Bay variants account for 44% of their total SKUs.
Now, if you remove the ones I didn’t remember existed (1926) and the ones I’ve never heard of (Royal, Clair De Rose), and my perception of Tudor is that their lineup is roughly 91.4% Black Bay. If it’s unfair to remove the 1926 because I just forgot about it, that takes us down to 59%. Still an astonishingly high percentage of the line in the public consciousness.
Of course, part of that is my fault, partly because I don’t pay as much attention to the watch world anymore and part of it is the media’s fault, because they seem to only cover sport and dive watch variations (though in defense of the watch media, don’t get to say that often, Tudor’s other models don’t really cry out for attention), so maybe I’m still being unfair. But still, 44% of an entire watch catalog being dedicated to one line is pretty high. And I think it’s at least a little excusable for me to perceive Tudor as having become the Black Bay brand and little else.