-
Aug 14, 2015, 10:15 PM
#11
Not bad, apart from the date and the '3'. Rather have a Hamilton or Seiko, though.
-
Aug 14, 2015, 10:55 PM
#12
Member
Too bad they don't have any light...
That's a deal breaker. Timex Weekender is a better choice for me.
-
Aug 14, 2015, 10:58 PM
#13
Originally Posted by
tribe125
Not bad, apart from the date and the '3'. Rather have a Hamilton or Seiko, though.
You have the Hamilton already don't you? This is in a completely different price bracket to Hamilton, and lower than equivalent Seikos too, unless I'm missing any.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
-
Aug 14, 2015, 10:59 PM
#14
Originally Posted by
samael_6978
Too bad they don't have any light...
That's a deal breaker. Timex Weekender is a better choice for me.
Surely the dream is a solar watch with Indiglo, where the Indiglo charges the watch....
-
Aug 15, 2015, 12:21 AM
#15
Originally Posted by
whatmeworry
You have the Hamilton already don't you? This is in a completely different price bracket to Hamilton, and lower than equivalent Seikos too, unless I'm missing any.
I do have the Hamilton, and I've previously owned the Seiko. I recognise the relevance of the different market sectors, and I like Casio - but not when they produce a watch that looks more like something else than a Casio.
To buy this Casio I'd need to be sure that the Seiko and Hamilton were completely unattainable.
-
Aug 15, 2015, 07:47 AM
#16
Originally Posted by
tribe125
I do have the Hamilton, and I've previously owned the Seiko. I recognise the relevance of the different market sectors, and I like Casio - but not when they produce a watch that looks more like something else than a Casio.
To buy this Casio I'd need to be sure that the Seiko and Hamilton were completely unattainable.
Ah, that makes a lot of sense.